By giving young women many more opportunities to compete in athletics
Title IX made possible the awe-inspiring female athletes we see today. I am singularly grateful for that.
Never far from it, Title IX was again in the news this week when the Obama administration, of course not without
fanfare, announced that it was revising (or re-revising) the rules of compliance for colleges.
I am not an expert on Title IX arcana, and have no desire to be, but ever the chronicler of politicians' capers, I can say without risking much that the move was made with political calculations in mind. The reform actually goes against the advice of the bipartisan
United States Commission on Civil Rights, and is probably a political stunt more than anything else. Obama and his minions know that he needs his base intact when
angry white men turn out en masse this November, if he is to keep Congress anyway.
Is the reform, then, itself wrong-headed? I don't think so, but I don't know enough about it to be counted on to say. But it is odd, I think, that the change goes against the recommendations of the USCCR. And at the
Sports Economist I found another option, seemingly ignored altogether, which again made me think. Then there was the infernal logic of the
Cato Institute.
I really couldn't care less about men's sports, collegiate or otherwise, and I'm always skeptical of claims suggesting that opportunities are being "stolen" from men and handed to women. Nonetheless, I do care about fairness, individual rights, rule of law—the things that make our society at least marginally better than a banana republic.
Title IX has clearly done much good. But that doesn't mean it's only benign. The handiwork of politicians rarely is (and the
Law of Unintended Consequences usually has its say if nothing else). Hence Title IX supporters, and here I count myself, should always be mindful of its potential flaws.
Finally, I'll caution once more against thinking that female athletes can gain equal status simply by fiat. That must be earned in gyms and on playing fields.
(Umm, did I miss something?)
latest comments
Wed, 25.01.2012 03:54
its not even close you can arg ue that women are already the stronger and more dominant sex .the only question is lo [...]
Sun, 15.01.2012 17:11
so what do you think about thi s: http://crooklynscorner.com /2012/01/rousey-cyborgs-failed -drug-test-a-sign-of-weakness/
Thu, 29.12.2011 20:20
She is too damn hot! Man, it' s like that video she did for Lori Victoria Braun's muscle c elebration show. The so [...]
Thu, 29.12.2011 04:16
Now, bare with me because what I say at the end might surpri se you, I do believe that Men are the stronger sex bot [...]