QuicksearchCategoriesSyndicate This Bloglinkscontact usCopyright© 2012 athleticwomen.com. All rights reserved.
|
Friday, July 17. 2009
Posted by Rob Mars
in Female Athletes, Female Bodybuilding, Feminism, Women's Sports
Comments (3) Trackbacks (3) Female Muscle: a little schooling for its detractors
It isn't hard to find comments, online and elsewhere, that mock, disparage, or generally discount the idea of a woman with large muscles; a powerfully built woman, so it seems anyway, is at once an undesirable and an impossibility. Although the comments aren't all phrased the same way, all spring from the same few fallacies.
We often hear, for instance, that large muscles make women too much like men. Implicit in this thinking, of course, is the notion that muscles are the exclusive property of men. Yet such isn't a biological imperative, otherwise women would be utterly incapable of growing large muscles, which we know isn't true. Rather, this is merely a social construct; one horribly antiquated and useless (nay harmful). Then, some say women are incapable of rivaling men in strength and other measures of athletic performance. These I call antievolutionists, because implicit in their thinking is that human biology is static and unchangeable. When in fact even our brains are malleable. (The brain is not only the most complicated organ, but also the one perhaps most responsible for production and regulation of hormones, including muscle-building hormones.) And if you think lasting physiological change results only from natural selection or breeding, well, that would be wrong too. Women have been denied opportunities to flex their muscles for most of history. Should it surprise anyone, then, that there is ground to be made up? (The two exceptions we know of from history—Sparta and Dahomey—also give the lie to the naysayers' arguments.) Nevertheless, now female athletes routinely do things that a generation or two ago no one thought possible. Women adapt easily; they evolve more rapidly than men. (Could it be any other way?) Given time they will rise up and compete with men in athletics, as they do now in most other facets of life. The quiet resolve shown by powerlifter Jessica Gallagher in the following video is typical of female athletes; why I foresee a day nearing when they will be formidable rivals to their male peers: Trackbacks
TIME 10 questions: Candace Parker
After some time off following the birth of her first child, WNBA MVP Candace Parker returned to...
Weblog: Athletic Women Blog
Tracked: Jul 23, 12:40
Advancing women's sports: largely a bootstrap process
Tasked with garnering more fans, advocates for women's sports might understandably think an...
Weblog: Athletic Women Blog
Tracked: Nov 02, 13:46
Best of '09: an idiosyncratic digest of bloggings
My little contribution to a "Best of '09" series by Women Talk Sports bloggers is a selection of...
Weblog: Athletic Women Blog
Tracked: Dec 31, 13:43 Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I once met a girl who was 19 or 20 years old at the time who, as a part of her workout routine, performed between 5 and 10 ONE ARM HANDSTAND PUSHUPS (against a wall) with each arm. Now that is strong!!
I'm not sure why people are negative about strong women, but I feel it too. As a female amateur boxer I've been asked "Aren't you being a little irresponsible?", as if by boxing I am more at risk to be injured, and therefore become a negligent mother, than if I were, say, knitting. What is up with that?
And I even have it in my OWN brain -- only recently did I test myself to see what kind of weights I could lift, and I was utterly suprised at my own power. Why have I been using such low weights in my training? Thanks for a great post and video. I'm RSSing you now.
Thanks for taking the time to comment, Lisa. It's always good to hear from a woman who has been in the trenches so to speak.
Unfortunately, till now you've been conditioned like most women to avoid heavy weights, in two somewhat contradictory ways: women, 'frail creatures that they are', can't handle heavy weights and therefore might injure themselves by lifting them; and its equally ignorant counterpart: a female who lifts heavy weights develops large muscles, at which point--in our binary-brained society anyway-- she becomes male (or something too close for parochial comfort). I'm glad to see that now you're ignoring this nonsense and doing what is best for you. |
MEET Athletic Women ~ athletic men too ~ Online dating for singles into muscle & fitness.
Join FREE! muscle-personals.com |




latest comments
Wed, 25.01.2012 03:54
its not even close you can arg ue that women are already the stronger and more dominant sex .the only question is lo [...]
Sun, 15.01.2012 17:11
so what do you think about thi s: http://crooklynscorner.com /2012/01/rousey-cyborgs-failed -drug-test-a-sign-of-weakness/
Thu, 29.12.2011 20:20
She is too damn hot! Man, it' s like that video she did for Lori Victoria Braun's muscle c elebration show. The so [...]
Thu, 29.12.2011 04:16
Now, bare with me because what I say at the end might surpri se you, I do believe that Men are the stronger sex bot [...]